Tagged: humanist

Conflating Life Cycles With Evolutionary Possibilities

There are two main reasons why many evolutionary claims are readily accepted as fact without sufficient supporting evidence. The first is that people are inculcated to believe what they are told by authority/media figures without question; without any critical thought–lest you be accused of being a “conspiracy theorist,” an “idiot,” a “rabble rouser,” “trouble maker, “denialist,” or “troll.” Yes those dreaded, scathing, oft-repeated labels that are used to induce conformity and discourage independent thought. The second reason is that, to the subconscious mind, claims that organisms evolved from unicellular to multicellular organisms and from sea dwelling animals to land dwelling animals are not only possible–they have been observed.

This is where the life cycles of sexually-reproducing multicellular eukaryotic organisms come into play–the best example being the life cycle of amphibians. In frogs, single reproductive cells (gametes) fuse together, develop into multicellular organisms (tadpoles) that can only survive in water, and finally become fully-formed frogs that are able to survive on land. This is an observable and undeniable fact. Using the sexual reproduction template, however, to claim that some prokaryotic (single-celled) organisms went through a sudden change from asexual reproduction to combining with each other to eventually become multicellular eukaryotic, sexually-reproducing organisms takes a huge leap of faith because it has never been observed. And there are no transitional fossils nor are there present observations of prokaryotes fusing with other prokaryotes to produce eukaryotes. And using the life cycle of amphibians (that are still heavily dependent upon a water source for skin respiration) as a template to claim that today’s terrestrial mammals all evolved from aquatic lifeforms  also requires a leap of faith that begs for evidence that is not there.

Unfortunately, these facts this matters little to evolutionists whose theoretical foundations are based on wild conjecture and subliminal associations; not on scientific reality.

Deep Thoughts: From Other Bloggers

“Why is the world not asking feminists why they never campaign for the right of Chinese women to choose?  They demand this right for women in the West but do not demand the right for women to choose how many children they want to have.”

–from blogger, “Dawkinswatch

Living in a Bubble

Contrary to popular belief amongst those of us living in the evolutionary bubble, there is no world-wide consensus supporting evolutionary theory as science. In fact, there are only 12 countries that mandate the teaching of evolution in public schools. Those countries are:

  1. Australia
  2. Brazil
  3. Denmark
  4. Netherlands
  5. Norway
  6. Poland
  7. Serbia
  8. Pakistan
  9. Russia
  10. Turkey
  11. United Kingdom
  12. United States

Note: All of Asia is missing from this list–as is all of Africa and Central America. Canada is not on the list. Most of Europe, South America, and the Middle East–absent from this list.

Source: Wikipedia

My Recent Encounters With Atheist Hypocrisy

During my relatively brief time of WordPress, about half of my encounters with atheists here have been civil, even pleasant; the other half consists of atheists who are quick to resort to ad hominem attacks and to censor points of views that detract from their own.  Many of these personal attacks (usually made only after I have been blocked from making comments) are surprisingly homophobic in nature–proof that bigotry, hate, and intolerance does not go hand-in-hand with being religious as many atheists maintain.

Case in point, this is the latest comment that I received (about an hour) ago from an atheist WordPress user who goes by the name “retrieverman”:

“Synapticohesion is banned.

He’s too stupid to comment in this blog. He’s proven this time and again, and what’s more, he thinks he’s smarter than me! LOL! Ignorant shits often think this.

He’s actually either a latent homosexual, who hates gays (of course!) or child molester, like all fundamentalist Christians.

I’ve tolerated as much of this bullshit as I can handle, and he obviously didn’t read my About Page when I said no creationist bullshit.

If he’s feeling bad because I hurt his feelings, he can go ask his preacher for a blowjob and that will make him feel better again.

You are a denialist little punk. You don’t know jack shit. You need to stop trying to talk down to people who know more than you.

And this comment will stay up, and I hope it’s a lesson to you.

When you’re an ignorant fool, don’t show up on blogs or message boards where the people are more educated than you are and try to spout this poppycock.

Don’t troll these blogs. You’re just wanting attention for your retarded little cartoon blog. I am removing the links to your site in every comment you’ve made. [Note: there were no links to remove.]

Don’t come back. Don’t try this again somewhere else.

Got it, punk?”

And that’s not all from “retrieverman,” who placed the following labels after my user name that precedes each comment (these are just a couple of examples):

“synapticohesion, a c*cksucker”

“synapticcohesion, a latent homosexual”

If this were a Christian using these same bigoted, homophobic, hate-filled, libelous words against an atheist–how would atheists react? And why do many atheists want to endlessly belittle, rant about, ridicule, and taunt others…unchallenged? To preach only to the proverbial choir?

 

Richard Dawkins: The “African Ape”

In an awkward and embarrassing confrontation with a Christian (who happens to be African), atheist Richard Dawkins maintains with all the unabashed fervor of a religious fanatic that he is an “African Ape” and “proud” and insists that the Christian should feel the same way.

And they say evolution is not a religion.